HAEFELYHERITAGE
EN
Home / Methodology
The discipline behind the narrative

The most important
tool is doubt.

We tell human stories about engineering, but we do not invent equipment, dates, people or world records to fill in gaps.

How this archive
makes claims.

Each story has a short entry, a documented technical scale, narrative paragraphs and links to the source documents. A title does not expand HAEFELY's involvement beyond the part specifically shown by the evidence.

Proven

Customer or original technical source identifies the equipment and scope.

One source

Published conservatively with source-specific limitation.

Open lead

Unconfirmed memory, request or manufacturer inference kept out of factual highlights.

Not everything with a giant voltage is a world record
MV
Nominal charging voltage / achieved impulse / particle beam energy / nuclear reaction products are not interchangeable.
Work still open

Missing evidence is visible.

The Swiss ownership documents

Original SWA minutes for the 1989 MBO and a complete CEO succession remain unexamined.

The Basel rooftop anecdote

A recollection of a high-voltage test and traffic jam needs a dated newspaper report or technical record.

Corporate staff numbers

2019 Basel employee count and current global group figures cannot be treated as a comparable HAEFELY time series.

Rights and factual review

Some uploaded archives have no confirmed public reproduction rights. English wording still awaits independent human approval.

This F4 edition was generated by a tested offline renderer because the npm registry was not reachable. The Astro source is being prepared for a future standards-based build, but no actual Astro compiler output is claimed without running npm ci && npm run build.